Liquidator's Third Report

Table Of Content:
Introduction

Scope Of Work

Assets

Cash At Bank

BAC Florida

Stourbridge_

Bear Stearns

Blue Ocean Properties

Liabilities

Progress to date

In the matter of the application to the Court for the removal of the Liquidator

Matters Before the Court

Collections and Disbursement (Table A)

Scott Wilson

Future direction of the Liquidation

Close Window    

RE: BANK CROZIER LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION)

 Introduction

 

1.      On 24th July 2003 I was appointed by the court to be the liquidator of Bank Crozier Limited (the bank).

 

2.      Pursuant to paragraph 16 of the Liquidation Order, this is my third report.

 

3.      The objectives of my appointment are to:  

·        Determine the potentially realizable assets of the Bank;  

·        Assess the number and value of legitimate creditors claims; 

·        Assess the extent to which creditors legitimate claims can be met; 

·        Assess the extent of progress made in accomplishing the tasks set out in the Liquidation Order; and 

·        Form a view regarding the likely future direction of the liquidation.

  

Scope of Work

Top

Assets 

Cash at Bank 

4.      The cash at Bank in Grenada is the sum of USD$ 5,000,000 in an account at RBTT Bank Ltd. in which the said amount has been frozen by the High Court pending the outcome of two court actions (namely the BCIL Suit and the Carla Bella Ltd. Suit) and USD$176,134 in the account at the Grenada Co-operative Bank Limited. No dates have yet been set for the hearing of the two court actions. 

 

5.      BAC Florida 

As of March 31st, 2004 Bank Crozier’s membership with MasterCard International (MasterCard) was terminated. Bank Crozier’s unpaid obligations to MasterCard was USD$ 490, 346.00 leaving a balance of USD$ 109,654.00 which was returned to the Liquidator via BAC Florida on March 31st, 2004, with further transmission to an account held in the Liquidator’s name at the Grenada Co-Operative Bank. (See Appendix A) 

Stourbridge 

6.      Documents were submitted to the Liquidator Blake Elyea of KPMG in Vancouver, Canada on 28 October 2003. Mr. Blake has filed two reports concerning Exchange Bank and Trust Ltd. (See Appendix B; Receivers Reports to the court) I am in the process of filing a claim with Mr. Elyea in order to secure a portion of the liquidated funds.

Bear Stearns 

7.      My US attorney and I met with Mr. Todd B. Hesse of Bear Stearns at his office in Manhattan on 18 March 2004. We attempted to determine the nature of the investment and what realization was possible at this point. We also sought to determine what Bear Stearns knew when they accepted funds from Mr. Johansson, particularly regarding the origin of those funds and Mr. Johansson’s obligations to the Bank’s creditors and legitimate depositors.

 

8.      Early in the meeting it became apparent that we would need to pursue a legal solution in respect of the retrieval of funds invested in the Bear Stearns Partnership arrangement. Mr. Hesse quickly referred us to his legal department since he was only willing to discuss with us technical matters relating to the investment. 

 

9.      All matters regarding our position with Bear Stearns Venture Partners are now in the hands of US legal counsel. I intend to pursue this matter until there is a reasonable and satisfactory outcome beneficial to all creditors. I cannot comment further at this stage.

 

Blue Ocean Properties 

10.  On 11 February 2004, the sole director of Blue Ocean Properties resigned clearing the way for the Liquidator to take full control of the company and the properties under its control. The fact that the properties controlled by Blue Ocean Properties Limited are beneficially owned by Bank Crozier Limited has never been contested.

 

11.  The land held at Point Salines in St. George’s has been sold. The proceeds are shown in the table of Income and Expenditure under the heading “proceeds from the sale of land”. Two valuations were obtained on the land prior to it being sold. I continue to occupy the house at Lance Aux Epines as the bank’s liquidation office and document centre since it continues to be a cheaper option than paying rent at any other facility (in the last six months alone I have saved US $16,300 on rental expenses).   

 

Liabilities

Top

  12.  Letters have been sent to all creditors who submitted notarized claims to the Liquidator requesting additional documents to legitimize their claims against the Bank. As at August 12th, 2004 I have accepted fourteen (14) claims with a total value of USD$ 1,720,811.10. (See Appendix C)

 

13.  Progress to date

Top

In the matter of the application to the Court for the removal of the Liquidator

 

14.  Several creditors, some legitimate and others of lesser standing applied to the court in February 2004 for the removal of the liquidator and the appointment of David Holukoff of PricewaterhouseCoopers and Mr. Floyd Patterson of Pannel Kerr Forster, St. Vincent and the Grenadines as the new Liquidators. The court granted leave for the application to proceed and a full hearing ensued after which the court rejected all the submissions of the Applicants. A copy of the Judgment is exhibited hereto. (See Appendix D)

 

Matters before the Court

 

15.  I have successfully defended two actions brought against me as Liquidator before the High Court.

 

16.  In Civil Appeal No. 27 of 2003 – Daryl Sands, Controller of Bank Crozier Ltd. v. Garvey Louison, Liquidator of Bank Crozier Ltd. and Civil Appeal No. 30 of 2003 – Daryl Sands, Controller of Bank Crozier Ltd. v. Garvey Louison, Liquidator of Bank Crozier Ltd. in which Daryl Sands filed an appeal against both judgments of Pemberton J. The Liquidator made two applications before the Court of Appeal seeking Orders of the Court of Appeal that Mr. Sands as Appellant provide security for costs in each of the two Appeals and that in the meantime all further proceedings be stayed and that each Appeal should stand dismissed if such security is not provided in the time prescribed. (See Appendix E and Appendix F)

 

17.  In Civil Appeal No. 30 0f 2003 – Daryl Sands, Controller of Bank Crozier Ltd and Garvey Louison, Liquidator of Bank Crozier Ltd., the Court of Appeal ordered that Mr. Sands within fourteen days of the Order give security for the Liquidator’s costs in the amount of EC $100,000.00 and that in the meantime all further proceedings be stayed. In Civil Appeal No. 27 of 2003, the Court of Appeal ordered that the Appeal stand dismissed if such security was not provided within the time prescribed. (See Appendix E and Appendix F)                                                                  

 

18.  In Civil Appeal No. 30 – Daryl Sands, Controller of Bank Crozier Ltd and Garvey Louison, Liquidator of Bank Crozier Ltd. the Court of Appeal ordered that Sands within seven days of the Order give security for the Liquidator’s costs in the amount of EC $50,000.00 by deposit of the same to the Court; that in the meantime all further proceedings be stayed. In Civil Appeal No. 30 of 2003 – Daryl Sands, Controller of Bank Crozier Ltd and Garvey Louison, Liquidator of Bank Crozier Ltd. it was ordered by the Court of Appeal that the Appeal should stand dismissed if such security is not provided within the prescribed time. (See Appendix E)

 

19.  It was further ordered that Sands pay the costs of the Applicant in the amount of ECD$ 1,500.00 for each of the Civil Appeals. A copy of the Judgment is attached hereto (See Appendix F)   

 

20.  Mr. Sands met the required security for costs deposit provisions in both cases. Both Appeals were scheduled to be heard during the November 2004 sitting of the Court of Appeal, however, due to the passage of Hurricane Ivan, those matters are now scheduled to be heard during the February 2005 sitting of the Court of Appeal.

 

Scott Wilson

 

21.  During my interview with Cora Felix (at the time General Manager of Bank Crozier Ltd) in August 2003 she confirmed Scott Wilson’s involvement in the management and control of the Bank. When it became clear that the very existence of the Bank was in question and that the management of the institution had to be changed in order to proceed with any form of proposal to the authorities, Scott Wilson was put forward as a credible alternative to the existing management. Scott Wilson was put forward inspite of the well-established fact that he had been involved in the running of the affairs of the Bank during earlier times.

 

22.  On 11 June 2003 Scott Wilson wrote a detailed proposal called “Bank Re-capitalization Plan” which was addressed to Mrs. Sharon A.N. Griffith, Executive Director, Grenada International Financial Services Authority (GIFSA). This plan was also intended to be presented to the court on the day of the liquidation hearing as a means of putting forward an objection to the liquidation proceedings. In his plan Scott Wilson proposed that all matters arising from a perusal of the plan should be discussed with himself, Peter Johansson and one Denzil Thomas.

 

23.  The full plan is annexed at Appendix G, however the following is a summary of the mains elements:

 

·        Investors will take 100% shares in the Bank;

 

·        He had the commitment of two investors to put new equity into the Bank;

 

·        New equity and a new Board of Directors will be introduced to the Bank with a further commitment to immediately bring substantial deposits and business;

 

·        New business will be brought to Grenada by way of a call centre;

 

·        The pending legal matters, Carla Bella and BCIL will be resolved;

 

·        All major assets will be moved out of the Bank;

 

·        All depositors will be moved out of the Bank and replaced with cash;

 

·        The Bank will be maintained as an ongoing operation;

 

·        The plan should satisfy many of the matters raised by the authorities as well as allow depositors to receive a high percentage of deposit funds with a possibility of receiving 100% within one year; and

 

·        The authorities should withdraw their proposal for the liquidation of the bank.

 

24.  In my view Scott Wilson is one of the persons who needs to explain his role in the bank and any other information that he might possess regarding the disappearance of depositor’s funds.

 

Collections and Disbursements

 

25.  Table A below shows the classification of collections and disbursements for the period February 2004 to June 2004. A summary of these collections and disbursements is shown in Appendix H.

Top
Table A– Collections and Disbursements to date

 

Description

 

Collections USD$

Sale of Land

 

115,000

Sale of Office Furniture

 

637

Costs awarded in settlement

 

1,873

Brought forward

 

649,390

Total

 

$766,900

Description

Disbursements USD$

 

Legal & Accounting Fees

127,986

 

Utilities

30,122

 

Staff Salaries

32,326

 

Outstanding Bills

47,634

 

Office Expenses

21,195

 

Expense Claims

112,507

 

Agent’s Fees

54,556

 

Liquidator’s Fee

105,000

 

Office Moving Costs

18,179

 

Publication Expenses

14,241

 

Security

19,112

 

Other

8,891

 

Total

$591,749

 

Balance

 

$175,151

  

 

Future direction of the Liquidation

Top

26.  The results of the court challenges, in particular the Carla Bella and BCIL Injunctions freezing the USD $5 Million in the banks in Grenada are central to a distribution to legitimate creditors. I do not have court dates for the hearing of these matters at this time. In event I cannot predict the proportion of that distribution neither the particular time frame within which the distribution is likely to take place.

 

27.  At this point my work has not progressed sufficiently to allow me to:

 

·        Determine the potentially realizable assets of the Bank;

 

·        Assess the exact number and precise value of legitimate creditors claims;

 

·        Assess the extent to which creditors legitimate claims can be met;

 

·        Assess the extent of progress made in accomplishing the tasks set out in the Liquidation Order; and

 

·        Form a view regarding the likely future direction of the liquidation.

 Close Window    

Top